Real.Good.News.

By Julian Sterling, Senior Anthropological Correspondent
January 17, 2026

In the early 2020s, we were warned that Artificial Intelligence would take our jobs. We were not warned that it would take our emotional stability and replace it with the temperament of a Victorian child deprived of sugar. As we navigate the mid-point of 2026, the data is in: the more we outsource our thinking to “empathetic” digital assistants, the more likely we are to throw a smartphone across the room because a Predictive Text algorithm didn’t appreciate our sarcasm.

The rise of Emotional AI Integration was meant to soothe the modern psyche. We have mirrors that compliment our skin tone and car seats that vibrate in sync with our heart rate to prevent road rage. Yet, the factual reality is a paradox of heightened sensitivity. Because our devices now anticipate our every whim, the slight lag in an AI Personal Assistant’s response feels less like a technical glitch and more like a personal betrayal. We have become a society of “Optimization Addicts,” where a 2% deviation from our curated daily comfort leads to a total cortisol spike.

We are witnessing the “Digital Mirror Effect.” By surrounding ourselves with AI that mirrors our preferences, we have lost the calloused emotional skin required to deal with actual, unpredictable humans. We are more connected than ever to Generative Personalities, yet we are increasingly unequipped to handle a coffee shop running out of oat milk without a minor existential crisis. The machines aren’t becoming more human; we are becoming more like the early versions of the software: prone to crashing when the input doesn’t match the code.